Is it more effective to have an organ donation system based on an individual's consent (opt-in) or one that assumes consent unless stated otherwise (opt-out)?

Is it more effective to have an organ donation system based on an individual's consent (opt-in) or one that assumes consent unless stated otherwise (opt-out)?

Worldwide, organ donation regulations show significant variations, raising questions over the most effective approach – opt-in or opt-out. To investigate, a team of researchers from the UK assessed the organ donation protocols of 48 countries to determine which method is more successful.

In opt-in systems, individuals must actively register as organ donors following their demise. In contrast, opt-out systems automatically authorize organ donation unless express prohibition is made prior to death.

Professor Eamonn Ferguson, lead author from the University of Nottingham, acknowledges potential drawbacks associated with these systems due to their reliance on individual actions:

"People may fail to act for a variety of reasons, including loss aversion, lack of effort, and trusting that policy makers have made the correct decision on their behalf."

Inaction in an opt-in system might result in potential donors who wish to donate not doing so (false negatives). In contrast, inaction in an opt-out system could lead to an individual who does not wish to donate becoming a donor (false positives).

The United States implements an opt-in system, facilitating 28,000 transplants last year through organ donors. Approximately 79 people receive organ transplants daily, while around 18 people die daily due to a deficiency in donated organs.

The research, led by the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University, compared the organ donation systems of 48 countries over a 13-year period. 23 countries followed an opt-in system, while 25 opted for an opt-out system.

The study observed higher total numbers of kidneys donated in countries adopting opt-out systems—the organ most sought after by those on the transplant list. These countries also reported greater overall organ transplant numbers.

Opt-in systems, however, demonstrated a higher rate of living kidney donations. This influential factor on living donation rates "has not been reported before," says Professor Ferguson, emphasizing the need for further consideration.

The study's limitations include not differentiating between degrees of opt-out legislation and not assessing other factors that may impact organ donation.

The researchers assert that their findings, published in BMC Medicine, indicate that opt-out consent increases deceased organ donation while reducing living donation rates. Opt-out consent also contributes to an increase in liver and kidney transplants.

They suggest that future policy decisions could benefit from the regular collection of international organ donation data—such as consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability—for public use.

Moreover, researchers recommend examining individual perspectives on the decision to opt in or opt out. This research could delve into beliefs, wishes, and attitudes using a combination of surveys and experimental methods, ultimately providing a deeper understanding of the influence of consent legislation on organ donation and transplantation rates.

While opt-out systems generally lead to higher deceased organ donation rates, the authors note that even countries with opt-out consent experience organ donor shortages. They propose that consent legislation or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model," which boasts the highest organ donation rate globally, may help improve donor rates.

Spain's success is often attributed to a national transplant coordination network and improved public information about organ donation. Recently, Medical News Today featured an article discussing the possibility of farming animal organs for human transplants as a potential solution to the organ shortage. However, this issue may be better addressed through adjustments to organ donation policy rather than considering controversial alternatives.

1. The study led by the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University compared the organ donation systems of 48 countries over a 13-year period and found that opt-out systems reported greater overall organ transplant numbers.
2. Professor Ferguson, the lead author from the University of Nottingham, emphasized that the study's findings indicate that opt-out consent increases deceased organ donation while reducing living donation rates.
3. The research also observed higher total numbers of kidneys donated in countries adopting opt-out systems, the organ most sought after by those on the transplant list.
4. To delve deeper into the influence of consent legislation on organ donation and transplantation rates, researchers recommend examining individual perspectives on the decision to opt in or opt out, using a combination of surveys and experimental methods.

Read also: