Skip to content

The debate on organ donation: which approach - requiring consent (opt-out) or obtaining it explicitly (opt-in) - is more effective?

Debate over Organ Donation: Should It Be an Opt-In or Opt-Out System?

A fresh individual in the United States is placed on the organ transplant waiting list roughly...
A fresh individual in the United States is placed on the organ transplant waiting list roughly every 10-minute stretch.

Scooping Global Organ Donation Laws: Opt-In or Opt-Out?

The landscape of organ donation policies worldwide is a diverse tapestry with significant contrasts. But which approach rules the roost - opt-in or opt-out? To unravel this mystery, a team of UK researchers scrutinized the organ donation regulations of 48 countries over a span of 13 years.

An opt-in system forces people to actively register their wish to donate their organs post-mortem. In contrast, opt-out systems declare organ donation as a default, with the option to opt-out before death.

Professor Eamonn Ferguson, leading the charge from the University of Nottingham, concedes that the reliance on personal decisions can lead to drawbacks:

"People might choose to procrastinate due to loss aversion, inertia, or a belief that authorities have made the 'right' decision."

In an opt-in system, indecision can precipitate false negatives, where individuals who might have wished to donate never do. Conversely, indecision in an opt-out system can foster false positives, resulting in individuals who do not wish to donate becoming donors.

The US is shackled by an opt-in system. Last year, over 28,000 transplants were made possible due to organ donors. Yet, every day, around 18 people lose their lives due to a scarcity of donated organs.

The Great Divide

The researchers from the University of Nottingham, University of Stirling, and Northumbria University delved into the organ donation systems of 48 countries for 13 years - 23 employing an opt-in system and 25 espousing an opt-out system.

They measured overall donor numbers, transplants per organ, and the total number of kidneys and livers transplanted from both deceased and living donors. Their findings revealed that opt-out systems yielded higher numbers of kidneys donated - an organ in high demand among organ transplant recipients. Opt-out systems also registered the greater overall number of organ transplants.

However, opt-in systems registered a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors. This apparent influence that policy had on living donation rates "has not been reported before," says Professor Ferguson, "and is a subtlety that needs to be highlighted and considered."

The authors admit that their research was limited due to not distinguishing between varying degrees of opt-out legislation, with some countries requiring permission from next-of-kin for organs to be donated. Additionally, the observational nature of their study meant that other factors affecting organ donation remained unassessed.

Barreling Forward

The researchers publish their findings in BMC Medicine and state that "opt-out consent may lead to an increase in deceased donation but a reduction in living donation rates. Opt-out consent is also associated with an increase in the total number of livers and kidneys transplanted."

They advise that their results could be exploited to inform future policy decisions but could be bolstered further through the regular collection and public dissemination of international organ donation information - consent type, procurement procedures, and hospital bed availability, for example.

Professor Ferguson opines that future studies could explore the viewpoints of those entrusted with the decision to opt in or opt out:

"Further research outside of this country-level epidemiological approach would be to examine issues from the perspective of the individual in terms of beliefs, wishes, and attitudes, using a mixture of survey and experimental methods."

The authors emphasize that countries employing opt-out consent still experience organ donor shortages. A complete system overhaul is, thus, unlikely to resolve this issue. Instead, they suggest that consent legislation or adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model" could be potential ways to improve donor rates.

The Spanish Model, currently the gold standard with the highest organ donation rate globally, employs opt-out consent but owes its success primarily to the transplant coordination network operating both locally and nationally, and the enhancement of public information regarding organ donation.

Recent discussions revolving around whether animal organs should be farmed for human transplants have resurfaced as a potential solution to the organ shortage. Could this be a practical option, or should we focus on refining our organ donation policies?

Written by James McIntosh

Insights:- Countries with opt-out organ donation systems generally have higher organ donation rates compared to opt-in systems, but this difference cannot be solely attributed to the legislative model itself.- Key contributing factors to higher donation rates in either system include public trust, healthcare infrastructure, family involvement, and cultural acceptance.- The Spanish success story is due to the synergy between opt-out legislation and an equipped transplant coordination system, backed by informed public support.- While the organ shortage problem cannot be solely solved by shifting from an opt-in to an opt-out system, potential improvements can be made through policy refinement and institutionally supporting public trust.

  1. The researchers found that opt-out organ donation systems, as seen in 25 countries, lead to higher rates of kidney donations and more overall organ transplants compared to opt-in systems, which are used in 23 countries.
  2. However, opt-in systems seem to register a higher rate of kidney donations from living donors, a finding that was not previously reported, according to Professor Eamonn Ferguson.
  3. In contrast to the common belief, the authors note that while opt-out systems have higher donation rates, they still experience donor shortages, implying that a complete system overhaul may not be the solution.
  4. The authors suggest that policymakers could consider adopting aspects of the "Spanish Model," which boasts the highest organ donation rate globally, rather than focusing on controversial alternatives such as farming animal organs for human transplants.

Read also:

    Latest